![]() Groups of images from the same shoot is keyworded/captioned, e.g.The keywording and captioning is done in batches: Develops are then keyworded and captioned, and if relevant sent to agencies.Selected raw images are processed into selected production images which are catalogued as “develops”.Raws are catalogued in an “originals” catalogue.This is (very simplified) my DAM workflow. The key, for me, to a good DAM tool is that it makes it very fast and easy to keyword and caption fairly large batches of images. Wine books in a wine library in a wine cellar DAM WORKFLOW I need the DAM to organise my files myself and to prepare files with embedded metadata to send to the stock libraries I work with. ![]() The background is, as mentioned, that I am an independent photographer that works with stock agencies (yes, they still exist). At least not me.)Ī) apply keywords and captions and other metadata, You don’t need the DAM to do the same thing, only worse… Perhaps it is useful for non-professional but as a photographer you’re not going to use the DAM to do image editing. Image editing is done with specialised software, like Photoshop. They think it is nice to have image editing functions included in the digital asset management application. (This is a point where many DAM software reviewers go wrong. I definitely don’t want: image editing capabilities in the DAM. presentation, slide-show, contact sheet, or web-gallery-type functionalities support for hierarchical keywords (I use that as a tool separate from the DAM when choosing which keywords to apply, but find it too rigid to have it integrated in the DAM itself.)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |